Risk-benefit assessment template
Woodland site
The standing assessment for the wood itself. Write it once, review it annually, walk it every session.
This is the first of the three you need. It covers the place rather than the activity: the trees, the ground, the boundaries, the things that are true whether you are lighting a fire or sitting still. Activity assessments sit on top of it, and the daily check on arrival sits on top of them both.
Nothing in here is a reason not to go to the wood. A site assessment that concludes 'too risky' has misunderstood the job. The point is to know your ground well enough to say yes to it, and to notice on the morning when something has changed.
Benefits of the experience
This column is why the activity happens. Write yours before you write a single hazard.
- Real, unmanicured nature, which is the thing the whole approach depends on. A site sanitised until nothing can happen is a site where nothing does.
- Children learn to read ground, weather and boundaries: a skill that transfers well beyond the wood.
- Returning to the same place across a term is what makes it forest school rather than a trip.
- A sense of belonging to a particular patch of ground, which children remember for years.
Hazards, controls and residual risk
Severity (S) and Likelihood (L) are each scored 1–3 and multiplied into a Risk Rating (RR). Low is 1–3, Medium 4–6, Significant 7–9. The final column is what is left after your controls, which is the number that matters.
| Experience / activity | Hazards | Associated risks | S | L | RR | Control actions | Risk after controls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Being under trees |
|
|
3 | 1 | 3 |
|
Low (1) |
| Moving around the site |
|
|
2 | 2 | 4 |
|
Low (2) |
| Sharing the wood with the public |
|
|
3 | 1 | 3 |
|
Low (1) |
| Being in vegetation |
|
|
3 | 1 | 3 |
|
Low (1) |
| Weather |
|
|
3 | 1 | 3 |
|
Low (1) |
The scoring key
Severity (S)
- 3 Death or major injury
- 2 Permanent disability or serious injury
- 1 Minor injury
Likelihood (L)
- 3 Occurs repeatedly
- 2 Will or could occur
- 1 Unlikely, though conceivable
Risk Rating (RR = S × L)
- 7–9 Significant
- 4–6 Medium
- 1–3 Low
What this template cannot know
Risk assessments are site-specific. This one is a starting point, not an answer, and copying it unchanged would be a mistake. Before you sign anything, work out the following for your wood and your group:
- Which trees are on your site, their condition, and when they were last inspected.
- Where your boundary actually runs, and what is immediately outside it (roads, water, livestock, public paths).
- Which poisonous or invasive species grow on your ground. If you cannot identify what grows there, that is the first control to fix.
- Your landowner's permissions and conditions, in writing.
- The ground itself: slopes, ditches, setts, and how it changes when it is wet.
Then put your name on it, date it, and set a review date. The assessment belongs to the person who signs it, which is you.
The paperwork around it
The taught form carries a header before the table, and it earns its place: the activity, the group, who carried the assessment out, the date it was written, the review frequency (annually is typical), the date it was last reviewed, a signature, and any other assessments it refers to. Your site assessment sits under all of your activity assessments, so name it here.
None of that is bureaucracy for its own sake. An assessment nobody signed and nobody reviewed is not an assessment, it is a document. And the review is where the near-misses you logged during the term finally do their job: they are the reason next year's version is better than this one.
Write it once. Stack it on every session.
Keep your assessments as a reusable library, stack the right ones onto each session (a frozen copy travels with the day), and log the dynamic call you make on the ground, offline, with cold hands. Free for practitioners, never per child.